![]() ![]() ![]() Only one of the threats to Lacey was serious enough to be referred to an outside law enforcement agency, however, and Long Beach police told The Times in March that investigators did not “believe the suspect intended to carry out the reported threat.”ĭavid Lacey’s defense attorney, Samuel Tyre, said his “client’s human instinct is forever and always to protect his wife and his family and to keep them safe from physical harm.” He declined to comment on the facts of the case.Ĭarl Douglas, the civil rights attorney representing Abdullah and two other protesters named in the complaint, described the Laceys’ explanation that they were in fear for their lives as “laughable.” He said that the Laceys’ home has a doorbell equipped with a camera that would have made clear the protesters at their doorstep were unarmed. A protester also rushed toward the stage shouting at Lacey during a January debate. At the time, a spokeswoman for the office said the family had received “numerous documented threats … including a death threat” in recent weeks. In March, The Times asked the district attorney’s office to provide additional information about threats faced by the Laceys. My husband felt that we were in danger and acted out of genuine concern for our well-being.” “Protesters arrived at my house shortly after 5 a.m. My husband acted in fear for my safety after we were subjected to months of harassment that included a death threat no less than a week earlier,” she said. “The events that took place earlier this year have caused my family immense pain. In a statement Tuesday, Lacey again cited the vitriolic campaign as a reason for her husband to be worried about their safety. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |